.
Otherwise 1/30 would produce a decimal number like 0.033..., which
was probably not intended.
Regards,
Ron
.
Regards,
Ron
to this:
%ret = map { { $^a = uc $^a } }, @arr;
I would expect that to be the same as
%ret = map - $a { my %h={ $a = uc $a }; %h }, @arr;
Regards,
Ron
of the objects also changes
things...
The orignal example
say Received $m message{ 1==$m ?? '' !! 's' }.
could then look like:
say Recieved {nominative({name='message',count=$m})}.
Maybe someone could find a more concise form if huffmanly desireable.
Regards,
Ron
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 12:18:47 +1300, Sam Vilain wrote:
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 17:16 +0100, Ron Blaschke wrote:
The Free Lunch Is Over: A Fundamental Turn Toward Concurrency in Software.
[1] He starts with The biggest sea change in software development since
the OO revolution is knocking
other through channels. Objects are owned by a single process only.
The Java folks have revamped The Java Memory Model. [4] Can't say much
to that one, as I am not through with it yet.
Hans-J. Boehm argues that Threads Cannot be Implemented as a Library. [5]
Ron
[1] http://www.gotw.ca
Sorry, instead of implicit 'commit', I mean to say implicit conversion.
-
Ron Reidy
Lead DBA
Array BioPharma, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Reidy, Ron
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 9:06 AM
To: Sam Vilain; Dean Arnold
Cc: dbi-users@perl.org; dbi-dev@perl.org; perl6
. On Oracle you'll
need to convert the ? to a 'TO_DATE(?)'.
No you do not. The SQL engine will perform an implicit commit of the data.
-
Ron Reidy
Lead DBA
Array BioPharma, Inc.
Sam.
This electronic message transmission is a PRIVATE communication which contains
information
