Michael Lazzaro wrote:
I worry that C sounds too much like something class-related,
and would confuse people. What about C or something? Decent
thesaurus entries for include:
assign, classify, comb, compartmentalize, discriminate, distribute,
group, order, segregate, sift, winnow, amputate,
Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tim Conrow) writes:
I'm not seeing it. My problem, or is it not being mirrored yet?
I'm reading it via NNTP.
Right, I've got it now. Don't know why I didn't see it there before.
-- Tim
I'm not seeing it. My problem, or is it not being mirrored yet?
-- Tim
logic in discussion of and around RFC 263, I think.
--
-- Tim Conrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Brent Dax wrote:
If we have 'and', 'or' and 'xor', can we have 'dor' (defined or) to be a
low-precedence version of this?
Oh man. If we've gone so far as 'dor', why not make it 'doh' :-)
print stomach_state @beer,@donuts doh burp!!!
--
-- Tim Conrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
and quickly with the special case where x1. This may not be
useful in an environment of pseudo-infinite precision, unless speed begins to
matter alot. Maybe they could be called automagically when the compiler sees
something like the RHS of the above as an optimization.
--
-- Tim Conrow
should make that more explicit. In a sense, it's already
proposed to be sort of an extension, just one which is provided to everyone.
Everyone's short of tuits, but I'd love to see some hint of where you think this
causes problems.
--
-- Tim Conrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
the RFC)), Cread, Csysread, string-context bitwise ops plus
Cselect and Cvec create "packed strings". If Unicode is commonly acquired or
manipulated by any of those and meant to stay human readable, then there may be
a conflict.
--
-- Tim Conrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
remove
your only source of annoyance. I don't *think* I have a problem with doing that.
--
-- Tim Conrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Tom Christiansen wrote:
Perhaps what you're truly looking for is a generalized tainting mechanism.
Sounds cool, but I have only the vaguest idea what you (may) mean. Pointers?
RFCs? Examples? Hints?
--
-- Tim Conrow [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
Tim Conrow wrote:
Tom Christiansen wrote:
Perhaps what you're truly looking for is a generalized tainting mechanism.
Sounds cool, but I have only the vaguest idea what you (may) mean. Pointers?
RFCs? Examples? Hints?
Sorry for the clutter, but I didn't want to come off too clueless. I
11 matches
Mail list logo
