On 9/23/06, Audrey Tang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
在 Sep 23, 2006 8:36 PM 時，Markus Laire 寫到：
> On 9/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> @args = [EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3;
>> -push [,] @args;# same as push @foo,1,2,3
>> +push [,] @args;# same as push(@foo:
在 Sep 24, 2006 12:21 AM 時，Audrey Tang 寫到：
在 Sep 23, 2006 8:36 PM 時，Markus Laire 寫到：
On 9/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@args = [EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3;
-push [,] @args;# same as push @foo,1,2,3
+push [,] @args;# same as push(@foo: 1,2,3)
I don't
在 Sep 23, 2006 8:36 PM 時，Markus Laire 寫到：
On 9/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@args = [EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3;
-push [,] @args;# same as push @foo,1,2,3
+push [,] @args;# same as push(@foo: 1,2,3)
I don't quite understand this. Shouldn't C<[,] @args
On 9/23/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
@args = [EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3;
-push [,] @args;# same as push @foo,1,2,3
+push [,] @args;# same as push(@foo: 1,2,3)
I don't quite understand this. Shouldn't C<[,] @args> be equivalent to
C<[EMAIL PROTECTED],1,2,3>
Author: audreyt
Date: Sat Sep 23 01:05:45 2006
New Revision: 12346
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S03.pod
Log:
* S03: Cleanup capture-exploding examples such that |@foo always
simply put @foo's elements as positional arguments, regardless
of whether @foo[0] contains a Hash. (On
