Trey Harris asked:
Another one...
class Foo is Bar;
method a {
setup();
}
1;
# EOF
(Is the 1 still required?
No.
I think I heard Damian say it was going away.)
Yes.
The question is, is this valid, if Bar defines a sub/static method
'setup'?
If Csetup is a Csub, yes.
On Fri, Aug 09, 2002 at 03:09:29PM -0400, Chris Dutton wrote:
This one actually came to me just the other night. Would it be possible
in Perl 6 to create anonymous classes? Something like:
my $foo_class = class {
method new {
# yada yada yada
}
}
my
Another one...
class Foo is Bar;
method a {
setup();
}
1;
# EOF
(Is the 1 still required? I think I heard Damian say it was going away.)
The question is, is this valid, if Bar defines a sub/static method
'setup'?
Is my instict right that 'sub' in a class is a 'class/static method' in
the
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 07:30:19PM -0400, Chris Dutton wrote:
The only problem I could see, and I wanted to wait for at least one
other opinion before mentioning this, is rewriting the above as:
my $foo_class $foo_obj = $foo_class.new;
I'm not exactly sure what you're trying to do with
On Monday, August 12, 2002, at 01:27 PM, Allison Randal wrote:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 07:30:19PM -0400, Chris Dutton wrote:
The only problem I could see, and I wanted to wait for at least one
other opinion before mentioning this, is rewriting the above as:
my $foo_class $foo_obj =
Since Adam Lopesto asked a non-regex question, I don't feel quite as out
of place for doing the same.
This one actually came to me just the other night. Would it be possible
in Perl 6 to create anonymous classes? Something like:
my $foo_class = class {
method new {
#
On Saturday, August 10, 2002, at 06:25 PM, Piers Cawley wrote:
Chris Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since Adam Lopesto asked a non-regex question, I don't feel quite as
out of place for doing the same.
This one actually came to me just the other night. Would it be
possible in Perl 6 to
