C. Scott Ananian wrote:
I think Ingo was trying to explicitly specify the normally-implicit
invocant; ie, invoke the method via the reference *without* using a '.'.
If this is possible (and I think it is), it's not (yet) clear what the
syntax would be. Maybe
$ref(Foo.new():)
I think for MMD c
On Thu, 19 May 2005, Juerd wrote:
Ingo Blechschmidt skribis 2005-05-19 22:45 (+0200):
class Foo {
method bar() { 42 }
method baz() { &bar }
}
my $ref = Foo.baz;
My guess:
Foo.$ref
$object.$ref
Just like in Perl 5.
I think Ingo was trying to explicitly specify the normally-implic
Ingo Blechschmidt skribis 2005-05-19 22:45 (+0200):
> class Foo {
> method bar() { 42 }
> method baz() { &bar }
> }
> my $ref = Foo.baz;
My guess:
Foo.$ref
$object.$ref
Just like in Perl 5.
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
http://convolution.nl/make_ju
Hi,
class Foo {
method bar() { 42 }
method baz() { &bar }
}
my $ref = Foo.baz;
$ref(); # Don't think this will work
# (Error: No invocant specified or somesuch)
$ref(Foo.new); # But will this work?
How do I specify multiple invocants (when dealing wit
