RE: Hyperoperators and dimensional extension

2002-09-19 Thread Brent Dax
Dan Sugalski: # Sort of, yes. # # Basically the behaviour of hyper-operated operators is delegated via ^ Spending time in England lately? ;^) # multimethod dispatch to the hyper-operator functions. By default the Well, yeah. But that doesn't really answer my

RE: Hyperoperators and dimensional extension

2002-09-19 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 8:27 AM -0700 9/19/02, Brent Dax wrote: Dan Sugalski: # Sort of, yes. # # Basically the behaviour of hyper-operated operators is delegated via ^ Spending time in England lately? ;^) Why, yes, actually. :-P But I've been using Pompous English Spelling for years. #

Re: Hyperoperators and dimensional extension

2002-09-18 Thread Dan Sugalski
At 12:04 AM -0700 9/18/02, Brent Dax wrote: The Apocalypse on operators says that if one of the operands of a hyperoperator is a scalar, then that scalar is (nominally) treated as an array of copies of that scalar. In other words: my $foo=1; my @bar=(2, 3, 4); my @baz=$foo