HaloO,
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
I posted my current work at
http://www.dlugosz.com/files/specdoc.pdf
Please look.
In 24.28.1 abs you define
our ::?CLASS multi method abs ( $x: )
I would rather nail down the return type to 'Num where {$_ = 0}'.
The latter might also get a nice name, e.g.
TSa Thomas.Sandlass-at-barco.com |Perl 6| wrote:
In 24.28.1 abs you define
our ::?CLASS multi method abs ( $x: )
I would rather nail down the return type to 'Num where {$_ = 0}'.
The latter might also get a nice name, e.g. Abs. This in turn would
make the abs multi method/sub kind of
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
Moritz Lenz moritz-at-casella.verplant.org |Perl 6| wrote:
John M. Dlugosz wrote:
I posted my current work at
http://www.dlugosz.com/files/specdoc.pdf
and .odt.
3.1.1 Normalization uses a constant without a sigil - is that really
allowed?
Yes, it's in
nice work,
I think this kind of redrafting can be a good foundation for
refactoring ... though I would go further and suggest an xml based
format ... if u have a .odt you can convert this to docbook ;)
one nit pick; drop 'rigorous' in title
Jim Fuller
