Perltalk

2003-01-21 Thread Thom Boyer
like we've got some Smalltalk fans here. What say we start a new mailing list for designing Perltalk? :-) =thom Riker: They were just sucked into space. Data: Blown, sir. Riker: Sorry, Data. Data: Common mistake, sir. (The Naked Now)

Re: Perltalk

2003-01-21 Thread Mark J. Reed
On 2003-01-21 at 11:09:21, Thom Boyer wrote: One of the most... er, *interesting*, dodges I've seen in this area is the one used by Squeak (a Smalltalk variant). Squeak spells assignment with an underscore (_), but the Squeak system *draws* it as a left-pointing arrow. There's a history behind

Re: Perltalk

2003-01-21 Thread Smylers
Thom Boyer wrote: Smylers [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: And an alternative spelling for the assignment operator[*0] doesn't strike me as something Perl is really missing: $msg ~ 'Hello there'; $msg = 'Hello there'; I still remember the first time I saw a computer program

Re: Perltalk

2003-01-21 Thread Austin Hastings
really add to the clarity of the code. I just don't want to have to write the parser! [1] What *do* you call this style of operator -- intermingled-fix? Looks like we've got some Smalltalk fans here. What say we start a new mailing list for designing Perltalk? :-) I can't even smell Spalltalk

Re: Perltalk

2003-01-21 Thread Uri Guttman
MJR == Mark J Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: MJR On 2003-01-21 at 11:09:21, Thom Boyer wrote: One of the most... er, *interesting*, dodges I've seen in this area is the one used by Squeak (a Smalltalk variant). Squeak spells assignment with an underscore (_), but the Squeak system