Aaron Sherman sent the following bits through the ether:
> It is not. That's exactly the point to AOP, to bring the two
May I suggest that all discussion move to the perl-aspects list
and that everyone take a look at the Aspect module on CPAN.
The language does not need to be changed to enable A
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 11:50:05AM -0700, David Whipp wrote:
> > If Perl is going to have data hiding (I think I read that this was a
> > goal), then you cannot declare these relationships outside of the
> > class that defines the method. That would be like putting a "friend"
> > delcaration only
You have seen Aspect.pm haven't you? Aspect Oriented Programming for
Perl 5, built on top of Hook::LexWrap and very, very cool.
--
Piers
"It is a truth universally acknowledged that a language in
possession of a rich syntax must be in need of a rewrite."
-- Jane Austen?
> If Perl is going to have data hiding (I think I read that this was a
> goal), then you cannot declare these relationships outside of the
> class that defines the method. That would be like putting a "friend"
> delcaration only on the foriegn class in C++. It simply should not
> work that way.
I
On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 10:42:09AM -0700, David Whipp wrote:
> Aaron Sherman wrote:
> > All of this is still coming into focus for me, and I want to spend
> > more time reading the articles later, but for now I just wanted
> > to see if anyone else has been thinking these thoughts
>
> I do li
Aaron Sherman wrote:
> All of this is still coming into focus for me, and I want to spend
> more time reading the articles later, but for now I just wanted
> to see if anyone else has been thinking these thoughts
I do like the idea of AOP; but I think the mechanism you suggest
are too clumsy.
