At 10:10 AM -0400 5/15/02, Aaron Sherman wrote:
>On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 00:39, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> At 8:58 PM -0700 5/10/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >I was wondering how perl6 would stringify (as in Data::Dumper):
>>
>> That's not stringification. It's serialization, which is a different
On Sat, 2002-05-11 at 00:39, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 8:58 PM -0700 5/10/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >I was wondering how perl6 would stringify (as in Data::Dumper):
>
> That's not stringification. It's serialization, which is a different
> thing entirely.
>
> What you'll potentially get is
"Brent Dax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> # I was wondering how perl6 would stringify (as in Data::Dumper):
>
> As Dan said, that's serialization. I don't know if Perl will support
> that built-in. But if it does...
>
> # 1) objects with 'my' and 'our' variables
>
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
# I was wondering how perl6 would stringify (as in Data::Dumper):
As Dan said, that's serialization. I don't know if Perl will support
that built-in. But if it does...
# 1) objects with 'my' and 'our' variables
Those would have to be dumped from the pads or stashes.
At 8:58 PM -0700 5/10/02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I was wondering how perl6 would stringify (as in Data::Dumper):
That's not stringification. It's serialization, which is a different
thing entirely.
What you'll potentially get is a thing that can be completely
reconstituted into what it orig
