[Quoting Dave Storrs, on September 26 2000, 11:47, in "Re: RFC 292 (v1) Ext"]
I'm confused...are you suggesting that the debugger should no
longer be integrated into perl?
Absolutely not!
What I wanted to indicate is that the input and output handling of the
debugger, currently line
On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Johan Vromans wrote:
What I wanted to indicate is that the input and output handling of the
debugger, currently line input and line output, should not be turned
into a sophisticated user interface with command line recall/editing
and fancy output paging (e.g. two
Perl6 RFC Librarian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The ability to easily retrieve and edit your N most recent commands to the
debugger (much like a bash_history).
and
A better default pager. The default pager should assume a 24x80 term
window ...
To me, these clearly indicates that the
On 26 Sep 2000, Johan Vromans wrote:
Perl6 RFC Librarian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The ability to easily retrieve and edit your N most recent commands to the
debugger (much like a bash_history).
and
A better default pager. The default pager should assume a 24x80 term
window ...
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 07:34:04PM -, Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Most of this RFC would probably be better off in perl6-stdlib; the debugger
isn't really part of the language. That being said, however...
The ability to easily retrieve and edit your N most
