Le Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:00:42AM +0200, le valeureux mongueur Pedro Larroy a dit:
Hi
Is there any chance that in perl6 there will be the possibility to write
if/else statements without {}s with the condition at the beginning?
Like
if (condition)
statement;
In order not to
Stéphane Payrard wrote:
Le Wed, May 12, 2004 at 02:00:42AM +0200, le valeureux mongueur Pedro Larroy a dit:
Hi
Is there any chance that in perl6 there will be the possibility to write
if/else statements without {}s with the condition at the beginning?
Like
if (condition)
statement;
In
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 12:57:15AM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 10:13 pm, Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:31:55PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
: On Tuesday 11 May 2004 08:00 pm, Pedro Larroy wrote:
: Hi
:
: Is there any chance that in perl6 there
Pedro Larroy writes:
Yes, thanks a lot for your answers. I appreciate them.
I think I'm now pretty attached to perl culture and I'm just a little
worried, as a humble perl programmer, about things changing too much
in perl6. Specially after reading coments like getting rid of the
parens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
familiar. You'll find this in the earlier Exegeses, Piers Cawley's
article Perl 6: Not Just for Damians
(http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/10/23/damians.html), some of the
presentations from the last few conference seasons, and scattered about
the
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:47:04AM +0100, Matthew Walton wrote:
: For some reason, lots of people don't like it when indentation is
: what's controlling their code structure...
Indentation is a wonderful form of commentary from programmer to
programmer, but its symbology is largely wasted on the
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:47:04AM +0100, Matthew Walton wrote:
: although it might perhaps be a little early to go for Python-like syntax.
s/early/late/
Python's syntax succeeds in combining the mistakes of Lisp and Fortran.
I do not contrue that as progress.
Larry
On Wed, 2004-05-12 at 11:22, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Luke Palmer) writes:
familiar. You'll find this in the earlier Exegeses, Piers Cawley's
article Perl 6: Not Just for Damians
(http://www.perl.com/pub/a/2001/10/23/damians.html), some of the
presentations from the last
Aaron Sherman skribis 2004-05-12 14:04 (-0400):
Perl 5:
#!/usr/bin/perl
while() {
s/\w+/WORD/g;
print;
}
Perl 6:
#!/usr/bin/perl
while $stdin.getline - $_ {
Empty uses ARGV, not STDIN. It only uses STDIN if not @ARGV
Larry Wall wrote:
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 09:47:04AM +0100, Matthew Walton wrote:
: For some reason, lots of people don't like it when indentation is
: what's controlling their code structure...
Indentation is a wonderful form of commentary from programmer to
programmer, but its symbology is
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 08:15:36PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: A2 says $*STDIN and $*STDOUT. Has this been changed?
It's $*IN and $*OUT.
: Also, will there no longer be the concept of a selected filehandle?
That is correct.
: I'd hate to have to specify stdin and stdout in throw away scripts.
Just
Aaron Sherman writes:
Right off the bat, let me say that I've read A1-6, E7, A12, S3, S6, E1,
E6 and much of this mailing list, but I'm still not sure that all of
what I'm going to say is right. Please correct me if it's not.
Did you really need to ask me to? ;-)
Perl 5:
Larry Wall skribis 2004-05-12 11:39 (-0700):
On Wed, May 12, 2004 at 08:15:36PM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: A2 says $*STDIN and $*STDOUT. Has this been changed?
It's $*IN and $*OUT.
I like this change!
: I'd hate to have to specify stdin and stdout in throw away scripts.
Just because there's no
Luke Palmer skribis 2004-05-12 12:46 (-0600):
Well, the IO-objects are iterators, and you use $iter to iterate. It
makes sense that would iterate over $*ARGV by default.
$*ARGS?
my $n = new IO::Socket::INET: LocalPort = 20010, Listen = 5;
I'd like to be able[1] to write
my $n =
Matthew Walton writes:
Juerd wrote:
my $n = IO::Socket::INET.new LocalPort = 20010, Listen = 5;
Or, if I'm remembering correctly:
my IO::Socket::INET $n .= new LocalPort = 20010, Listen = 5;
I really hope I'm remembering correctly. Is this turning into the 'look
how great Perl 6
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Aaron Sherman) writes:
is it really that new and scary?
No, but not for the reasons you think. You seem to believe that you're
comparing Perl and a Perl-derived language and pointing out that they're
both like Perl, but it looks like you're comparing two Algol-derived
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 08:00 pm, Pedro Larroy wrote:
Hi
Is there any chance that in perl6 there will be the possibility to write
if/else statements without {}s with the condition at the beginning?
Like
if (condition)
statement;
In order not to break traditional C culture. Is there
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:31:55PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
: On Tuesday 11 May 2004 08:00 pm, Pedro Larroy wrote:
: Hi
:
: Is there any chance that in perl6 there will be the possibility to write
: if/else statements without {}s with the condition at the beginning?
:
: Like
:
: if
On Tuesday 11 May 2004 10:13 pm, Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 08:31:55PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
: On Tuesday 11 May 2004 08:00 pm, Pedro Larroy wrote:
: Hi
:
: Is there any chance that in perl6 there will be the possibility to
: write if/else statements without {}s
19 matches
Mail list logo
