On 9/9/05, Juerd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am glad "item" is as official as it gets, but I have no personal
> favourite between "list" and "slurpy". Please, list members, start a
> flame w^W^Wdiscussion about this so that it can be settled.
I'll fire the first shot: type names should be nouns
Larry Wall skribis 2005-09-09 16:45 (-0700):
> It's item and list, I think.
Pugs uses CxtItem and CxtSlurpy.
I am glad "item" is as official as it gets, but I have no personal
favourite between "list" and "slurpy". Please, list members, start a
flame w^W^Wdiscussion about this so that it can be s
On Sat, Sep 10, 2005 at 12:36:26AM +0200, Juerd wrote:
: Are "item context" and "slurpy context" official terms yet? (Note that
: "official" is temporary, not permament, and has nothing to do with
: things being set in stone.)
:
: If so, then are the keywords for forcing context also "item" and
:
