Re: TPF donations (was Re: L2R/R2L syntax [x-adr][x-bayes])

2003-01-25 Thread Damian Conway
David Storrs wrote: Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't the one thing that all those projects have in common...well...Perl? And isn't Larry the guy to whom we owe the existence of Perl? I'm not fortunate enough to be using Perl in my job, but I'm still more than happy to pony up for a donation,

Re: TPF donations (was Re: L2R/R2L syntax [x-adr][x-bayes])

2003-01-21 Thread Nicholas Clark
On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 02:21:58PM -0800, Austin Hastings wrote: > > --- David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This is something along the lines of the applied research vs basic > > research question. What Larry is doing pretty much amounts to basic > > research that will help all of these

Re: TPF donations (was Re: L2R/R2L syntax [x-adr][x-bayes])

2003-01-21 Thread Austin Hastings
--- David Storrs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:21:08PM -0800, Damian Conway wrote: > > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > > > Well, I'll be pretty interested to discover what cause is deemed > more > > > deserving than Larry, Perl 6 or Parrot. The P still stands for > Perl, > >

TPF donations (was Re: L2R/R2L syntax [x-adr][x-bayes])

2003-01-21 Thread David Storrs
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 04:21:08PM -0800, Damian Conway wrote: > Paul Johnson wrote: > > > Well, I'll be pretty interested to discover what cause is deemed more > > deserving than Larry, Perl 6 or Parrot. The P still stands for Perl, > > right? > > True. But I suspect that TPF's position is that