Re: precedence for x and ~

2005-02-19 Thread Damian Conway
Juerd wrote: According to S03, ~ is tighter than x, while in Perl 5, . was looser than x. No. According to S03, *unary* ~ is tighter than x. *Binary* ~ is looser: symbolic unary ! + - ~ ? * ** +^ ~^ ?^ \ multiplicative * / % x xx + + + ~ ~ ~ additive+ - ~ +| +^ ~|

Re: precedence for x and ~

2005-02-19 Thread Juerd
Damian Conway skribis 2005-02-20 11:28 (+1100): According to S03, ~ is tighter than x, while in Perl 5, . was looser than x. No. According to S03, *unary* ~ is tighter than x. *Binary* ~ is looser: symbolic unary ! + - ~ ? * ** +^ ~^ ?^ \ multiplicative * / % x xx + + + ~ ~