pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-11-19 05:34:29 +0100 (Thu, 19 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 29129
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] as several folks have suggested, rename blorst to blast
I'm curious about this change. I quickly figured out that
- docs/Perl6/Spec
To: perl6-language@perl.org
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-11-19 05:34:29 +0100 (Thu, 19 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 29129
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] as several folks have suggested, rename blorst to blast
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 08:17, Thom Boyer t...@boyers.org wrote:
I'm curious about the change from blorst to blast. I quickly figured out
that blorst was
derived from BLock OR STatement (as S04 used to say: In fact,
most of these phasers will take either a block or a statement (known as
a
I kinda like 'blorst'. The word makes me think of a warm stew on a cold
winter night. And I agree with the searchability advantage of 'blorst'
as well.
/bikeshed
-'f
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-11-19 05:34:29 +0100 (Thu, 19 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 29129
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] as several folks have suggested, rename blorst to blast
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-11-19 05:34:29 +0100 (Thu, 19 Nov 2009)
New Revision: 29129
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
Log:
[S04] as several folks have suggested, rename blorst to blast
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
