Re: role invocant slot in type sig (was: unusual invocants)

2009-10-26 Thread TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)
HaloO, On Thursday, 22. October 2009 20:58:15 I wrote: The class Dogwood however might be written as class Dogwood does Dog[Dogwood:] does Wood[Dogwood:] { method Dog {...} method Wood {...} method bark {...} } On #perl there was the question if any type

role invocant slot in type sig (was: unusual invocants)

2009-10-22 Thread TSa (Thomas Sandlaß)
HaloO, On Thursday, 22. October 2009 18:31:16 I wrote: The invocant slot of the role signature is sort of implied in the spec already! I also like this because a type in Perl 6 is then always written as SomeRole[SomeClass:]. Classes without explicit roles are Any[SomeClass:] and untyped is