I'm working on an RFC on module versioning. It'd be done by now, except
my boss and family keep expecting me to work and be fatherly. :-) Let
me get that banged out, and then lets look at adding wildcards to it.
On Tue, Aug 08, 2000 at 10:02:35AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
> "Peter Bevan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Just a thought, but I think it woul be a good idea to include the
> > 'java-esqe' practice of including packages via foo.barr.*
Hey, I'm famous :)
> However, I do like the idea of syn
- Original Message -
From: "Piers Cawley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Peter Bevan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 08, 2000 10:32 AM
Subject: Re: wildcard includes
> "Peter Bevan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > &
"Peter Bevan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Just a thought, but I think it woul be a good idea to include the
> 'java-esqe' practice of including packages via foo.barr.*
> or in Perl's case Foo::Bar::* (assume that the module include syntax remains
> the same)...
>
> I can see that in the case o
Just a thought, but I think it woul be a good idea to include the
'java-esqe' practice of including packages via foo.barr.*
or in Perl's case Foo::Bar::* (assume that the module include syntax remains
the same)...
I can see that in the case of some module directories, where the modules are
fairly
