On Nov 19, 2005, at 13:08 , Chip Salzenberg wrote:
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 05:46:51AM +0200, Ilmari Vacklin wrote:
I don't much like it - it looks like a mistyped 'shift'.
Is 'filter' too long?
I usually avoid P6L discussions, but:
GNU Make has filter and filter-out, and I've always found
On Thu, Nov 17, 2005 at 01:55:31PM -0800, Ovid wrote:
: In http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=509413 (in response to
: http://perlmonks.org/?node_id=509256), Rob Kinyon wrote that in his
: understanding of Perl 6 Roles, anything a role can do the class doing
: the role should also be able to do.
:
:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2005 at 11:36:33 -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
If we had some kind of partitioning operator, it'd probably be generalized
to sorting into bins by number, where 0 and 1 are degenerate cases for
booleans. But since we'd almost certainly make the general form
(@bin0, @bin1,
In Perl 5,
for (reverse @foo) { $_ = $_ + 1 }
actually works. But reverse does not return lvalues, which means that:
(reverse @foo) = map $_ + 1, @foo;
does not do the same thing, but actually throws an exception.
I think, but haven't confirmed, that the for-reverse is an
optimization
Maybe
\x{123a 123b 123c}
is a nice alternative of
\x{123a} \x{123b} \x{123c}.
--
Grtz, Ruud
Ruud H.G. van Tol skribis 2005-11-20 1:19 (+0100):
Maybe
\x{123a 123b 123c}
is a nice alternative of
\x{123a} \x{123b} \x{123c}.
Hmm, very cute and friendly! Can we keep it, please? Please?
Juerd
--
http://convolution.nl/maak_juerd_blij.html
On Sun, Nov 20, 2005 at 01:26:21AM +0100, Juerd wrote:
: Ruud H.G. van Tol skribis 2005-11-20 1:19 (+0100):
: Maybe
: \x{123a 123b 123c}
: is a nice alternative of
: \x{123a} \x{123b} \x{123c}.
:
: Hmm, very cute and friendly! Can we keep it, please? Please?
We already have,
Juerd [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think something like
my @bar := reverse @foo;
would be very useful. Insert an element between positions 1 and 2, and
the original @foo array gets them between positions -3 and -2.
That would be cool. The concept is reminiscent of using a
change of
