Ovid wrote:
Larry pointed out that this topic is better suited
for perl6-language instead of perl6-users, so I'm
forwarding this along.
Is there a reason perl6-users isn't fed through to nntp.perl.org ?
Maybe it is but I don't know to which group?
mAsterdam schreef:
Ovid:
Larry pointed out that this topic is better suited
for perl6-language instead of perl6-users, so I'm
forwarding this along.
Is there a reason perl6-users isn't fed through to nntp.perl.org ?
Maybe it is but I don't know to which group?
Author: larry
Date: Fri May 26 09:57:12 2006
New Revision: 9310
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S06.pod
Log:
Clarifications of inner type from sam++.
Deployment of julian++ at 200605252055, 8`lb + 7`oz, 20`in.
Ref: http://www.wall.org/cgi-bin/photo/index.cgi?mode=viewalbum=/pix/Julian
l == larry [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
l Log:
shouldn't that be grandpa's log, earth date 200605252055?
l Deployment of julian++ at 200605252055, 8`lb + 7`oz, 20`in.
lRef:
http://www.wall.org/cgi-bin/photo/index.cgi?mode=viewalbum=/pix/Julian
so when does he get his commit bits? :)
On 5/23/06, Sam Vilain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, but we should really ship with at least a set of Meta Object
Protocol Roles, that covers the core requirements that we will need for
expressing the core types in terms of themselves;
- classes and roles
- attributes and methods
- subsets
--- Stevan Little [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/23/06, Sam Vilain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People can diverge completely with completely incompatible
metaclasses that don't .do those roles, the only side effect
of which being that people who write code for the standard
Perl 6 metamodel
Hi,
I used AI::Prolog once briefly, and that's the extent of my logic programming
knowledge. There do seem to be a few Perl 6 features that may be useful for
logic programming, although I'm not really qualified to judge.
How would one assert facts and rules in Perl6? How would one know
that
