Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 04:18:31PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
On Mon, Jul 02, 2001 at 12:59:51PM -0700, David Whipp wrote:
Its not quite the same thing, but Java does have the concept of
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 12:10:19AM +0200, Bart Schuller wrote:
The Apple Newton was programmed in NewtonScript, a prototype-based
language. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~schoedl/projects/NewtonScript/ seems
like a nice overview.
Ahh, its derived from Self.
--
Michael G. Schwern [EMAIL
Ziggy came up with a good example of when object inheritance makes
life easier. Basically, there are times when you'd want to override
individual methods of individual objects. Example below.
- Forwarded message from Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Michael G Schwern
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 08:34:00AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
my $anon = My::Anon::ObjectFactory-new({base = 'Class',
method1 = sub { ... },
method2 =
On Tue, 3 Jul 2001, Bart Schuller wrote:
The Apple Newton was programmed in NewtonScript, a prototype-based
language. http://www.cc.gatech.edu/~schoedl/projects/NewtonScript/ seems
like a nice overview.
NewtonScript was an excellent language; with prototype-based inheritance,
you could get
On Tue, Jul 03, 2001 at 10:26:39AM +0100, Piers Cawley wrote:
Hmm... let me write it first would you? Shouldn't be *too* hard.
Suggestions for a real name for it?
Class::Anonymous? Class::Anon?
PS base has to take an array ref. Don't forget MI!
--
Michael G Schwern [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simplifying somewhat (ok, a heck of a lot), an rvalued:
$foo is bar
or
$foo : bar
is syntactic sugar for:
bar($foo)
with some extra magic for handling a properties hash
associated with $foo's value, in particular resetting
On 7/3/01 8:14 PM, Damian Conway wrote:
You lost me here. Your ideas for properties are different from mine
(which may well, in turn, be different from Larry's).
Anyone else get the feeling that properties are to Perl 6 what oo was to
Perl 5? :) It's like we'll finally be getting the oo bit
John Porter wrote:
Michael G Schwern wrote:
Give me data aggregation by inheritance
Oooh, now that would be useful.
Of course it would. That's why nearly every OO language (beside Perl)
has it.
package circular_list_node;
... # defines how the list_nodes do their
Forgive my woeful ignorance Could someone define data aggregation by
inheritance? From John's original mention I thought this was some oblique
MI thing, but now it's sounding like a constructor bubbling scheme, like in
C++, etc.
Thanks!
matt youell
10 matches
Mail list logo
