> On Wed, Jul 17, 2002 at 12:13:47PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > I thought Java used UTF-16. It's a variable-width encoding, so it
> > should be fine. (Though I bet a lot of folks will be rather surprised
> > when it happens...)
Update:
Since Unicode 3.1 (3.2 is the current version), there h
Sean O'Rourke wrote:
> -- languages/perl6 should work equally well with 5.005_03 and 5.6.1.
s/should/does/
EOT ;-)
> /s
leo
At 8:23 AM -0700 7/31/02, Sean O'Rourke wrote:
>On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>
>> [Pardon the tardiness--digging through old mail]
>> At 3:39 PM -0400 7/22/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>> >At 12:00 PM 7/22/2002 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>> >>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:09AM +0100,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> [Pardon the tardiness--digging through old mail]
> At 3:39 PM -0400 7/22/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
> >At 12:00 PM 7/22/2002 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
> >>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:1
[Pardon the tardiness--digging through old mail]
At 3:39 PM -0400 7/22/02, Melvin Smith wrote:
>At 12:00 PM 7/22/2002 +0100, Nicholas Clark wrote:
>>On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:21:09AM +0100, Graham Barr wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 11:14:15AM +0100, Sam Vilain wrote:
>>> > "Sean O'Rourke"
