Re: Superpositions and laziness

2002-11-21 Thread Piers Cawley
Damian Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Piers Cawley wrote: Cis is compile-time. So, how would one create a class which inherits from some other class when you don't know what said other class is until runtime? Use Perl5-ish classes, or an Ceval. Perl5-ish classes? You mean 'bless {},

Re: TERN-discuss mailing list finally available

2002-11-21 Thread Austin Hastings
They can't be very serious -- the archive link is dead. Or perhaps everyone agrees that something needs to be done, but no-one has any ideas? =Austin --- Joseph F. Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: david wrote: The brazen heresy continues...

Re: Coroutines, continuations, and iterators -- oh, my! (Was: Re: Continuations elified)

2002-11-21 Thread fearcadi
Damian Conway writes: There's no second iterator. Just Cfor walking through an array. ( questions in the form of answers :-) so : * for impose array context for first argument and doesnt care about nature of the array which it was given eventually as an argument . no multiple

Re: Unifying invocant and topic naming syntax

2002-11-21 Thread Me
[perhaps] : bare blocks (even those passed as args) just : pick up from the surrounding lexical context. This is definitely a significant simplification. Is it a problem? Yes, that's the problem. A bare block would have to notice at run time that it was called with unexpected arguments and

Re: Unifying invocant and topic naming syntax

2002-11-21 Thread Larry Wall
On Thu, Nov 21, 2002 at 11:27:07AM -0600, Me wrote: : And documenting this by the '-' distinction : described above (ie - means private $_ set : by mumble, no - means $_ is just the outer : lexical) would look natural as well being : logical and strikingly simple. It would, however, force people

RE: Unifying invocant and topic naming syntax

2002-11-21 Thread Martin D Kealey
On Thu, 2002-11-21 at 20:11, Brent Dax wrote: Are you suggesting this? if($error) { use visible 'croak'; require Carp; import Carp: 'croak'; croak($error); } No - that would be pointless as well as error-prone. My idea

Re: Unifying invocant and topic naming syntax

2002-11-21 Thread Me
Are you suggesting this? if($error) { use visible 'croak'; require Carp; import Carp: 'croak'; croak($error); } No - that would be pointless as well as error-prone. My idea of visible is that it would make a lexically scoped thing accessible to an inner dynamic scope at

This week's Perl 6 summary

2002-11-21 Thread Piers Cawley
The Perl 6 Summary for the week ending 20021117 Oh! my ears and whiskers, I'm late! It's 0650, it's 20021120 and I've only just started writing the summary. Call me lazy, call me a shirker, call me anything you damn well please, just don't interrupt me while I'm writing this.