On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 03:30:06PM -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
The focus here, I think, is the following problem class:
sub twenty_five() { 25 }# Optimized to inline
sub foo() {
print twenty_five; # Inlined
twenty_five := { 36 };
print twenty_five;
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 15 Sep 2003, Dan Sugalski wrote:
Great. But will it also be possible to add methods (or modify them)
to an existing class at runtime?
Unless the class has been explicitly closed, yes.
That strikes me as back-to-front.
The
My, is this a conspiracy to drag -internals onto -language to make it look alive? :)
You guys almost made me drop my coffee mug...
--
Robin Berjon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Research Scientist, Expway http://expway.com/
7FC0 6F5F D864 EFB8 08CE 8E74 58E6 D5DB 4889 2488
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... spending the morning of your 36th birthday
Happy birthday to you and us.
l - A full year has passed, hasn't it? - eo
On Tue, 16 Sep 2003, Ph. Marek wrote:
You can, of course, stop even potential optimization once the first I can
change the rules operation is found, but since even assignment can change
the rules that's where we are right now. We'd like to get better by
optimizing based on what we can see
On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 11:49:52AM -0400, Gordon Henriksen wrote:
Austin Hastings wrote:
Given that threads are present, and given the continuation based
nature of the interpreter, I assume that code blocks can be closured.
So why not allocate JITed methods on the heap and manage them as
David Storrs wrote:
This discussion seems to contain two separate problems, and I'm not
always sure which one is being addressed. The components I see are:
1) Detecting when the assumptions have been violated and the code has
to be changed; and,
2) Actually making the change after we
--- Gordon Henriksen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Storrs wrote:
This discussion seems to contain two separate problems, and I'm not
always sure which one is being addressed. The components I see
are:
1) Detecting when the assumptions have been violated and the code
has
to be
Leopold Toetsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Piers Cawley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... spending the morning of your 36th birthday
Happy birthday to you and us.
Thanks.