Hi,
Yuval Kogman nothingmuch at woobling.org writes:
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 22:27:56 +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
Not code, but the return value of code.emit
Hm, Str? Or possibly a subtype of Str, allowing:
I would guess an AST, that is, any object, that implements
On Sun, Aug 21, 2005 at 12:11:17 +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
Hi,
Yuval Kogman nothingmuch at woobling.org writes:
But we should note that some backends don't generate meaningful
ASTs, simply because they don't convert PIL - target language
AST - target language, but PIL - target
On Sat, Aug 20, 2005 at 10:33:03PM +, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
: Hi,
:
: S02 says:
: our $a; say $::(a); # works
:
: my $a; say $::(a); # dies, you should use:
: my $a; say $::(MY::a); # works
That looks like somebody's relic of Perl 5 thinking. Personally,
I
Output?
sub foo (+$a, *%overflow) {
say %overflow{};
}
foo(:a(1), :b(2)); # b2
foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b = 2 }); # b2
foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b = 2 }, :c(3)); # ???
Luke
Hi,
Luke Palmer wrote:
sub foo (+$a, *%overflow) {
say %overflow{};
}
foo(:a(1), :b(2)); # b2
foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b = 2 }); # b2
I'd think so, too.
foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b = 2 }, :c(3)); # ???
Error: Too many
On 22/08/05, Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Output?
sub foo (+$a, *%overflow) {
say %overflow{};
}
foo(:a(1), :b(2)); # b2
foo(:a(1), :overflow{ b = 2 }); # b2
I would have thought:
overflow b 2
i.e.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 06:42:04PM +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote:
If there is some really odd code signature which takes in a mess, I
may want to intermix positionals and named's in order to increase
readability.
AFAIR, named parameter syntax will work for positionals as well[*].
So even if you
