On Thu, Sep 01, 2005 at 17:12:51 +, Luke Palmer wrote:
On 9/1/05, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 31, 2005 at 13:43:57 -0600, Luke Palmer wrote:
Uh yeah, I think that's what I was saying. To clarify:
sub foo (prefix:+) { 1 == 2 }# 1 and 2 in numeric
On Sat, Sep 03, 2005 at 11:45:33 +0300, Yuval Kogman wrote a lot.
I'd like to summarize:
* if operators are not special than they are defined in perl 6
(maybe)
* if operators are defined in terms of other operators, then
overriding an operator may interfere with
On Fri, Sep 02, 2005 at 17:56:39 +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
Hi,
multi foo ($a) {...}
multi foo ($a, $b) {...}
say foo.arity;
# die? warn and return 0? warn and return undef? return 1|2?
A multi sub is a collection of variants, so it doesn't have arity,
each
On 03/09/05, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A multi sub is a collection of variants, so it doesn't have arity,
each variant has arity.
I'd say it 'fail's.
But if the reason you're calling `foo.arity` is to answer the
question Can I call this sub with three arguments? then that kind of
On Sun, Sep 04, 2005 at 00:27:39 +1000, Stuart Cook wrote:
if foo.accepts(:pos(1..3) :namedfoo bar :code) { ... }
I prefer this api... Arity is ambiguous will multiply variadic args.
We have any number of positionals, nameds, and zero, one or two
slurpies.
None of this really answers the
On 9/3/05, Stuart Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 03/09/05, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A multi sub is a collection of variants, so it doesn't have arity,
each variant has arity.
I'd say it 'fail's.
But if the reason you're calling `foo.arity` is to answer the
question Can
