> "LW" == Larry Wall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
LW> By the way, it's possible that I might deserve a little more money,
LW> because *my* cat died last year, and as near as I can tell, I didn't
LW> spend any money on girls and booze because of it... :)
i will donate to get larry a new
> From: Gabor Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2008 2:04 PM
>
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
> >
> > > I am mostly ignoring the rest of what others have said in this
> thread
>
On Fri, Feb 15, 2008 at 03:12:20PM -0800, Larry Wall wrote:
> No, there's no problem with that. This is Perl 6, which is full of
> wonderfulness, not Perl 5, which was written by a person of minimal clue. :)
>
> That's part of what S02 means right at the top where it's talking
> about a one-pass
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Dave Rolsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008, Joshua Gatcomb wrote:
>
> > I am mostly ignoring the rest of what others have said in this thread
> > because I think it is detracting from your intention of getting money to
> > people to work more.
Hm, I see a minor nit...
On Feb 23, 2008, at 12:40 , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+A C may share dispatch with multis declared after it in the
same scope,
-^^
but in that case it functions only as the final tie-breaker if the
inner multies can't decide
Author: larry
Date: Sat Feb 23 09:40:46 2008
New Revision: 14515
Modified:
doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
Log:
some clarifications on multiple dispatch and protos
Modified: doc/trunk/design/syn/S12.pod
==
--- doc/trunk