John M. Dlugosz wrote:
I'm taking a stab at turning the S\d\d documents into a formal standard.
That's certainly a nice idea, and much work. ++ for taking it.
Cheers,
Moritz
--
Moritz Lenz
http://moritz.faui2k3.org/ | http://perl-6.de/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
HaloO,
Larry Wall wrote:
It's also possible I'm just nuts, and slice context should be a purely
run-time activity.
Reading your explanation of array slice context I missed an
answer to the question how the shape of an array is split
into the contexts of functions called inside .[]. I guess
I've been working hard on re-organizing the S\d\d docs and other lore into a
technical
specification with an outline suitable for the contents.
But lately I've done some original work on what strong typing means and the
detailed
semantics of having types.
So, please take a look at section
Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
purpose, like
BEGIN
END
INIT
CATCH
etc.
What do you call those? They are not even special named blocks
because that is not the block name (that already means something).
--John
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 1:31 AM, John M. Dlugosz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Consider the words that may be used to introduce a block for a special
purpose, like
BEGIN
END
INIT
CATCH
etc.
What do you call those? They are not even special named blocks because
that is not the block
