I just put together http://www.dlugosz.com/Perl6/web/class-declarators.html as
part of my analysis and documentation effort. I'll link the meanings to more
extensive treatments.
Did I miss any *possible* combination?
--John
* John M. Dlugosz [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-11 06:25]:
I do agree that it may be better for multi-word identifiers
than camel case or underscores, as seen in many other languages
that the great unwashed masses have never heard of.
XML and the stack of related technologies also do this (in
On 10 Aug., 00:58, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Patrick R. Michaud) wrote:
On Fri, Aug 08, 2008 at 07:32:52AM +0200, Carl Mäsak wrote:
Jonathan ():
That this means the { $_ = uc $_; } above would end up composing a Hash
object (unless the semicolon is meant to throw a spanner in the
Joe Gottman jgottman-at-carolina.rr.com |Perl 6| wrote:
What happened to the let and temp declarators?
They are not declarators in the same sense as my/our. They cause a
run-time action to occur on existing variables.
--John
I'm still somewhat ambivalent about this, myself. My previous
experience with hyphens in identifiers is chiefly in languages that
don't generally have algebraic expressions, e.g. LISP, XML, so it will
take some getting used to in Perl. But at least in Perl's case the
subtraction conflict is
From: Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:07:33 -0400
I'm still somewhat ambivalent about this, myself. My previous
experience with hyphens in identifiers is chiefly in languages that
don't generally have algebraic expressions, e.g. LISP, XML, so it will
That sounds cool. Did you do it at the editor level, or at the keyboard
level?
=Austin
Bob Rogers wrote:
From: Mark J. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 09:07:33 -0400
I'm still somewhat ambivalent about this, myself. My previous
experience with hyphens in
I'm still somewhat ambivalent about this, myself. My previous
experience with hyphens in identifiers is chiefly in languages that
don't generally have algebraic expressions, e.g. LISP, XML, so it will
take some getting used to in Perl. But at least in Perl's case the
subtraction conflict is
Actually I can even imagine allowing almost all chars
in the middle of identifiers.
Is this a trend we should extrapolate into the lifetime scope
of the Perl 6 language?
How far are we in this process, given Unicode guillemets for hyper ops?
Kindly,
Michael
-Original Message-
From:
From: Austin Hastings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2008 10:02:06 -0500
That sounds cool. Did you do it at the editor level, or at the keyboard
level?
=Austin
In Emacs; see rgr-c-electric-dash-mode in [1], or other similar
solutions in [2]. That way, I can turn it on for
Mark J. Reed wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Tom Christiansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
People use nonadic functions (nonary operators? where non = 0, not 9)
without parens, and get themselves into trouble for it.
I believe the word you're looking for is 'nullary.
Alternately, the
* Michael Mangelsdorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-08-11 20:25]:
Unicode guillemets for hyper ops?
Unicode? I don’t know about your ISO-8859-1, but mine has
guillemets. :-)
Regards,
--
Aristotle Pagaltzis // http://plasmasturm.org/
12 matches
Mail list logo
