Larry Wall wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:57:30PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
> : What's the status of numeric upgrades in Perl 6? Is see the docs say "Perl
> 6
> : intrinsically supports big integers and rationals through its system of type
> : declarations. Int automatically supports p
On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:57:30PM -0400, Michael G Schwern wrote:
: What's the status of numeric upgrades in Perl 6? Is see the docs say "Perl 6
: intrinsically supports big integers and rationals through its system of type
: declarations. Int automatically supports promotion to arbitrary precisi
What's the status of numeric upgrades in Perl 6? Is see the docs say "Perl 6
intrinsically supports big integers and rationals through its system of type
declarations. Int automatically supports promotion to arbitrary precision" but
it looks like it's doing the same thing as Perl 5.
$ ./perl6 -e
Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
>> note to treematching folks: it is envisaged that signatures in
>> a rule will match nodes in a tree
>>
>>My question is, how is this expected to work? Can someone give an
>> example?
>
>I'm assuming that this relates to Jon Lang's comment about using
>
