A very interesting question came up on #perl today, so I'm
forwarding it to p6l for discussion/decision.
Given the following code:
sub foo() { return 1; }
sub bar() { warn "oops"; }
{
CONTROL { ... }
foo();
bar();
}
S04 seems to clearly indicate that
* Aristotle Pagaltzis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [081208 19:16]:
> * Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-07 14:20]:
> > So why are you all so hessitating in making each other's life
> > easier? There is no 100% solution, but 0% is even worse!
>
> It looks like Python 3000 just tried that.
> People
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Aristotle Pagaltzis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It looks like Python 3000 just tried that.
>
> People are not happy about it:
> http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/python/OsListdirProblem
>
Yeeh, I also noted exactly that problem when reading the "What's New
In
* Mark Overmeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-12-07 14:20]:
> So why are you all so hessitating in making each other's life
> easier? There is no 100% solution, but 0% is even worse!
It looks like Python 3000 just tried that.
People are not happy about it:
http://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/pyth
Daniel (>), Carl (>>):
>> That is all good and well for exiting the map itself; but what I want
>> to achieve is to exit the surrounding sub or method block. Example:
>
> Er... I mean actually the opposite... it should always return from the
> surrounding sub or method, never only from "map", if yo
On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 03:09:30PM -0800, Moritz Lenz via RT wrote:
> > ...but not :x() together with :nth()...
> >
> > $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3foo4".subst("foo", "bar", :x(2),
> > :nth(2))' # expected foo1bar2foo3bar4
> > foo1bar2foo3foo4
> >
> > The above are my personal expectations. The
On Sun Dec 07 07:24:07 2008, masak wrote:
> The .subst method in Rakudo r33599 can understand :x()...
>
> $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3foo4".subst("foo", "bar", :x(2))' # yes
> bar1bar2foo3foo4
>
> ...and :nth()...
>
> $ perl6 -e 'say "foo1foo2foo3foo4".subst("foo", "bar", :nth(2))' # yes
> foo1
Em Seg, 2008-12-08 às 12:08 +0100, Carl Mäsak escreveu:
> Daniel (>), Carl (>>):
> That is all good and well for exiting the map itself; but what I want
> to achieve is to exit the surrounding sub or method block. Example:
Er... I mean actually the opposite... it should always return from the
surr
Daniel (>), Carl (>>):
>> The above reasoning raises the following question for me: how do I
>> return from a sub or a method from within a map block?
>
> I suppose what you want can be achieved with "last", it probably should
> work in "map" as well, since "map" and "for" are synonims...
That is
Em Dom, 2008-12-07 às 18:10 +0100, Carl Mäsak escreveu:
> The above reasoning raises the following question for me: how do I
> return from a sub or a method from within a map block?
I suppose what you want can be achieved with "last", it probably should
work in "map" as well, since "map" and "for"
10 matches
Mail list logo
