Jon Lang wrote:
An unrelated possibility would be to allow empty A<> tags in a
declarator block, with 'A<>' being replaced with the name of the
declarator to which the block is attached:
And then I think:
A<_>
--
Ruud (indoctrinated)
Damian Conway wrote:
> Jon Lang kept his promise:
>
>> I promised some further thoughts; here they are:
>
> Much appreciated.
You're welcome.
>> As written, declarator aliasing attaches the alias to a piece of code,
>> and draws both the name and the alias from that. What about using a
>> specia
Damian Conway wrote:
> Raiph elucidated:
>> I was thinking it would be possible to reference (compiler) variables
>> representing eg. the name and sig of a block being parsed, or a block
>> or declaration which has just been parsed, or which is just about to be
>> parsed, and that simply referencin
Jon Lang kept his promise:
> I promised some further thoughts; here they are:
Much appreciated.
> As written, declarator aliasing attaches the alias to a piece of code,
> and draws both the name and the alias from that. What about using a
> special case of the declarator block for this? That
Raiph elucidated:
> Hmm. I was thinking Pod would be parsed by a P6/PGE grammar, one that
> could be relatively easily edited/extended to suit another context, because,
> I thought, it could then be made available as a stock --doc subsystem that
> all PCT based languages get more or less for free.
pugs-comm...@feather.perl6.nl wrote:
+All package bodies (including module and class bodies) execute at the
+normal execution time of the code in which they are embedded. For normal
+mainline code, this is the normal flow of execution; if this is too late
+to initialize something in the package
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-09-07 20:32:55 +0200 (Mon, 07 Sep 2009)
New Revision: 28201
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
Log:
[S06] remove the slightly non-sensical 'use GLOBAL' in favor of 'defines'
Modified: docs/Perl6/Spec/S06-routines.pod
===
Author: lwall
Date: 2009-09-07 19:53:06 +0200 (Mon, 07 Sep 2009)
New Revision: 28199
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S04-control.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S10-packages.pod
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
Log:
[S10] specify time of execution of package blocks and module (non)mainline code
[S12] give e
yary wrote:
[ a lot of good things that make lot of sense ]
Your complaints and review by TimToady and pmichaud on #perl6 convinced
me that this is not a good idea after all, see
http://irclog.perlgeek.de/perl6/2009-09-07#i_1475421
Cheers,
Moritz
Author: moritz
Date: 2009-09-07 19:30:17 +0200 (Mon, 07 Sep 2009)
New Revision: 28197
Modified:
docs/Perl6/Spec/S12-objects.pod
Log:
[S12] undo '...' semantics in class bodies.
Now only a single ... term in the classes marks that class as a forward
declaration, making it a declaration.
Modifi
On Mon, Sep 07, 2009 at 09:56:51AM -0700, yary wrote:
> I just saw the intent for this in the " split up compilation of the
> setting" thread- that it is useful to:
> >Enable a "class stub" syntax that allows us to declare a given symbol
> > as being a valid class without having to declare the body
I just saw the intent for this in the " split up compilation of the
setting" thread- that it is useful to:
>Enable a "class stub" syntax that allows us to declare a given symbol
> as being a valid class without having to declare the body of the
> class at that time. For example:
>
> class Rat
This spec subtly alters the meaning of "...". Whereas "yada" used to
mean "this is not yet implemented, complain if executed" it now adds
"but don't complain if it is a class fully implemented elsewhere".
Allowing two implementations of a class iff one of them has a yada
opens up maintenance issue
13 matches
Mail list logo
