Sterin, Ilya [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just one question, how
would merge behave on two different sized arrays.
@a = (1..5);
@b = (1..10);
merge(@a, @b);
##Would return (1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,5,5,??
Would it stop on the shortest array. Couldn't quite find such explanation
in the
Bart Lateur wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001 09:00:25 -0400, John Porter wrote:
for ( $XL-{Application}-{ActiveSheet} ) {
$_-cells(1,1) = Title;
$_-language() = English;
}
(presuming lvalue-methods, of course...)
So, in this case, a with synonym for for would
I've go tired of typing :), but if I had current index-iterator ( say under
$i just as example) at hand the way I have $_ i can just type :
print $_ : $b[$i]\n for @a;
OR
print $a[$i] : $b[$i]\n for @a;
For a general solution to this see Buddha Buck's RFC on iterators:
I haven't been tricked into reading MJD's article yet, but might your
third option be multiple functions with parameter-type-based dispatch?
We can do that with perl 5, but it isn't automatic.
The problem with polymorphic functions is you have to rewrite the
function N times (where N ==
