Re: [perl6/specs] a7cfe0: [S32] backtraces overhaul

2011-08-23 Thread philippe.beauch...@bell.ca
Help us always-explains-the-joke-man!!...
:)





Philippe R. Beauchamp
Secure Channel | Bell Business Markets
Associate Director - Application Services
Phone:   613-781-8953
Cell:613-327-6928


- Original Message -
From: Moritz Lenz [mailto:mor...@faui2k3.org]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 04:56 AM
To: perl6-language@perl.org perl6-language@perl.org
Subject: Re: [perl6/specs] a7cfe0: [S32] backtraces overhaul

Am 23.08.2011 10:46, schrieb Damian Conway:
 It's a trivial point, but why hidden_from_backtrace instead of
 hidden-from-backtrace? Especially given that the associated
 method is is-hidden, not is_hidden?

The current stance seems to be that low-level things are spelled with 
underscores, while we reserve the minus character for user-space code. 
Try grepping the specs for identifiers of built-ins that have a minus in 
it -- I didn't find any in a quick search.


 And why is this entire message written in questions?

Is it? I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean.

See 
https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/a7cfe02002f665c120cf4b735919779820194757 
maybe it's a charset problem on your machine, or something.

Cheers,
Moritz


Re: [perl6/specs] a7cfe0: [S32] backtraces overhaul

2011-08-23 Thread philippe.beauch...@bell.ca
Whoosh
No... LOL

I was making reference to another Whose Line game, (as Damian was with the all 
questions thing)... And the hyphen thing. :)




Philippe R. Beauchamp
Secure Channel | Bell Business Markets
Associate Director - Application Services
Phone:   613-781-8953
Cell:613-327-6928


- Original Message -
From: Richard Hainsworth [mailto:rich...@rusrating.ru]
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 06:28 AM
To: perl6-language@perl.org perl6-language@perl.org
Subject: Re: [perl6/specs] a7cfe0: [S32] backtraces overhaul

If you're asking for an explanation of the humour, then it's easy. There 
is no word play or a significant reference to a program only available 
to a special audience.

Seems to me that when Damian got to the end of his email he noticed that 
each sentence ended in a '?'

That's not usual. Most emails contain assertions and questions.

The humour is really when he appended a ? to his own name. Was he 
really questioning what he was called?

Richard

On 08/23/2011 02:19 PM, philippe.beauch...@bell.ca wrote:
 Help us always-explains-the-joke-man!!...
 :)





 Philippe R. Beauchamp
 Secure Channel | Bell Business Markets
 Associate Director - Application Services
 Phone:   613-781-8953
 Cell:613-327-6928


 - Original Message -
 From: Moritz Lenz [mailto:mor...@faui2k3.org]
 Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2011 04:56 AM
 To: perl6-language@perl.orgperl6-language@perl.org
 Subject: Re: [perl6/specs] a7cfe0: [S32] backtraces overhaul

 Am 23.08.2011 10:46, schrieb Damian Conway:
 It's a trivial point, but why hidden_from_backtrace instead of
 hidden-from-backtrace? Especially given that the associated
 method is is-hidden, not is_hidden?
 The current stance seems to be that low-level things are spelled with
 underscores, while we reserve the minus character for user-space code.
 Try grepping the specs for identifiers of built-ins that have a minus in
 it -- I didn't find any in a quick search.


 And why is this entire message written in questions?
 Is it? I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean.

 See
 https://github.com/perl6/specs/commit/a7cfe02002f665c120cf4b735919779820194757
 maybe it's a charset problem on your machine, or something.

 Cheers,
 Moritz