At 6:59 AM + 3/27/04, Simon Cozens wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Gottman) writes:
This function would be very useful in inner loops, so if it is possible to
implement it more efficiently in the core than as a sub in a module I think
we should do so.
And, if it's possible to implement it
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:31:13AM -0500, Dan Sugalski wrote:
: At 6:59 AM + 3/27/04, Simon Cozens wrote:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Gottman) writes:
: This function would be very useful in inner loops, so if it is possible
: to
: implement it more efficiently in the core than as a sub in a
- Original Message -
From: Luke Palmer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juerd writes:
Has this Csay already been decided?
Doesn't matter, because most of these decisions are up for discussion.
I think everything that was decided when Apocalypse 3 was written has
changed at least three times
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joe Gottman) writes:
This function would be very useful in inner loops, so if it is possible to
implement it more efficiently in the core than as a sub in a module I think
we should do so.
And, if it's possible to implement it more efficiently in the core than as a
sub in a
