Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Any Code()simple closure truth match if $b-() (ignoring $a)
I obviously missed that when it went past on p5p. Surely that should
read
Any Code()predicate(value) match if $b-($a)
meaning that $a satisfies the predicate
On 2/8/06, Mike Guy wrote:
I obviously missed that when it went past on p5p. Surely that should read
Any Code()predicate(value) match if $b-($a)
meaning that $a satisfies the predicate implemented by the code $b?
Ignoring $a seems a completely stupid thing to do.
Well,
On 09/02/06, Mike Guy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Any Code()simple closure truth match if $b-() (ignoring $a)
I obviously missed that when it went past on p5p. Surely that should
read
Any Code()predicate(value) match if
On 10/02/06, Stuart Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IIRC, that rule exists so you can create when-clauses that don't
involve the current topic, without having to explicitly throw it away.
This is useful when using given/when to replace a sequence of elsifs,
when not all of them use $_.
(In
On 2/7/06, Robin Houston [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any undef undefinedmatch if !defined $a
Any Regex pattern matchmatch if $a =~ /$b/
Code() Code()results are equalmatch if $a-() eq $b-()
Any Code()simple closure
Luke wrote:
My interpretation (which may be totally off, as I don't have any
confirmation that anybody else is thinking the same way I am) is that
the synopsis is wrong, and commutivity of ~~ is a happy coincidence
wherever it exists. The way I've been thinking about ~~ is just as
the
