On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 12:27:53AM +0200, Ingo Blechschmidt wrote:
: Hi,
:
: Andrew Shitov wrote:
: say $pair[0]; # a?
:
: It looks like $pair is an arrayref while 'say ref $pair' tells 'Pair'.
:
: right, this is why I asked, IMHO it's bogus.
Yes, for bare pairs, it's probably somewhat
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:36:16 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
There's something to be said for having a way of indexing into that
using numeric subscripts. Certainly Lisp's extensible car/cdr notation
is the wrong way to do it, but cdddr is certainly shorter than
$pair.value.value.value
Seems like you left out the degenerate case for when you run out of pairs:
sub infix:!! (Scalar $x, 0) { $x }
On 2005-08-05 16:24, Yuval Kogman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 11:36:16 -0700, Larry Wall wrote:
There's something to be said for having a way of indexing
Hi,
my $pair = (a = 1);
say $pair[0]; # a?
say $pair[1]; # 1?
I've found this in the Pugs testsuite -- is it legal?
--Ingo
--
Linux, the choice of a GNU | Black holes result when God divides the
generation on a dual AMD | universe by zero.
Athlon!|
Hi,
Luke Palmer wrote:
On 8/4/05, Ingo Blechschmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
my $pair = (a = 1);
say $pair[0]; # a?
say $pair[1]; # 1?
I've found this in the Pugs testsuite -- is it legal?
Nope. That's:
say $pair.key;
say $pair.value;
Also:
say
