On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
A closer examination of Martin's message indicates that he tends to think
that hitting a junction ought to thread the entire program throughout the
rest of the lifespan of said junction
Yes -- and well put, thank-you.
The trick is that since
This email was mistakenly not sent to the p6l list.
Jon writes:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Richard Hainsworth
rich...@rusrating.ru wrote:
Jon Lang wrote:
In Junction Algebra, Martin Kealey wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009, Mark J. Reed wrote:
( $a = any(-1,+1) = $b ) ==
( $a =
On Wednesday, April 01 2009 07:38 am, Richard Hainsworth wrote:
Right now, yes. I'm arguing that the way that they're designed to
work doesn't DWIM. Try a slightly different example:
0 = $x = 1 # 0 is less than $x is less than 1.
$x ~~ 0..1 # $x is in the range of 0 to 1.
I submit
HaloO,
Richard Hainsworth wrote:
( $a = any(-1,+1) any(-1,+1) = $b )(*A)
[..]
$tmp = any(-1,+1);
$a = $tmp $tmp = $b (*B*)
Quite how the lines I have labelled (A) and (*B*) are
different, I do not understand. Unless wrapping a junction in a
