noncitizen is the more appropriate term you are looking for I think
regards
steve
-Original Message-
From: chromatic [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 August 2008 04:03
To: Bob Rogers
Cc: perl6-language@perl.org
Subject: Re: A few multiple dispatch questions
On Tuesday 05 August
Larry Wall wrote:
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:17:30PM +0200, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Hi,
I am currently reviewing bits of the spec surrounding multiple dispatch
and, of course, have a question or two (I'll probably have some more
later, as the dust settles in my head).
1) The spec
HaloO,
Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Does the veto take place once the multiple dispatch has given us a
candidate and we try to bind the parameters to the signature, or as part
of the multiple dispatch? For example, supposing I declare:
multi foo(Int $a;; Num $b) { ... } # 1
multi foo(Int $a;;
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 06:17:30PM +0200, Jonathan Worthington wrote:
Hi,
I am currently reviewing bits of the spec surrounding multiple dispatch
and, of course, have a question or two (I'll probably have some more
later, as the dust settles in my head).
1) The spec says:
--
A proto
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 12:01:29 Larry Wall wrote:
I believe veto is giving the wrong idea here as something that
happens after the fact. What's the term for only allowing acceptable
candidates to put their names on the ballot?
disenfranchise
-- c
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 15:25:47 Bob Rogers wrote:
On Tuesday 05 August 2008 12:01:29 Larry Wall wrote:
I believe veto is giving the wrong idea here as something that
happens after the fact. What's the term for only allowing
acceptable candidates to put their names on the
