On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:58, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
It also might be useful for roles to be able to delete members and
methods from a class like so:
role foo {
has $.x;
has not $.y;
}
But that brings up
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 10:49, Aaron Sherman wrote:
Quoting S12:
A class's method definition hides any role definition of the
same name, so role methods are second-class citizens. On the
other hand, role methods are still part of the class itself, so
they hide
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 09:58, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
It also might be useful for roles to be able to delete members and
methods from a class like so:
role foo {
has $.x;
has
On Tue, 2005-04-26 at 12:44, Abhijit Mahabal wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005, Aaron Sherman wrote:
So, as you can see, in the case of mixins, the hypothetical:
role z {
has not mymeth;
}
Sorry, my bad. I wandered sideways into talking about methods. has, of
course, only
