On Wed, 25 Feb 2009, Larry Wall wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 02:05:28PM +1100, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Does this mean that $! is a container of some sort?
It's an object, which (in the abstract) can contain anything it jolly
well pleases. The main question beyond that is how it
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
My suggested solution would be to change $! to an exception container
object. But then we have to use it in the implicit given in the CATCH block.
If we used an any() Junction, would that do what we want?
Ok, Moritz told me on IRC that this
Em Qui, 2009-02-26 às 22:26 +1100, Timothy S. Nelson escreveu:
given(any(@!)) {
}
using junctions on exception handling doesn't seem like a good idea to
me, because it is too much of a basic feature... but...
for @! {
}
might provide the needed semantics...
OTOH, I think it would be sane to
Em Qui, 2009-02-26 às 08:55 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
for @! {}
might provide the needed semantics...
After sending this mail I've just realized I don't know exactly which
are the needed semantics...
what happens if you have several unthrown exceptions in the block, does
it throw every one
On Thu, 26 Feb 2009, Daniel Ruoso wrote:
Em Qui, 2009-02-26 às 08:55 -0300, Daniel Ruoso escreveu:
for @! {}
might provide the needed semantics...
After sending this mail I've just realized I don't know exactly which
are the needed semantics...
what happens if you have several unthrown
S04 says:
Because the contextual variable C$! contains all exceptions collected in the
current lexical scope, saying Cdie $! will throw all exceptions,
whether they were handled or not. A bare Cdie/Cfail takes C$! as the
default argument.
Does this mean that $! is a container
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 02:05:28PM +1100, Timothy S. Nelson wrote:
Does this mean that $! is a container of some sort?
It's an object, which (in the abstract) can contain anything it jolly
well pleases. The main question beyond that is how it responds if
used like one of the standard
