>Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
>assembley language. I've got:
> ...
>Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since I've
>done numeric work.
HP calculators sometimes define
lnp1(x) = ln(1 + x)
expm1(x) = exp(x) - 1
to deal accu
At 02:12 PM 9/10/2001 -0700, Hong Zhang wrote:
> > Uri Guttman
> > > we are planning automatic over/underflow to bigfloat. so there is no
> > > need for traps. they could be provided at the time of the
> > > conversion to big*.
> >
> > OK. But will Perl support signaling and non-signaling NANs?
>
> Uri Guttman
> > we are planning automatic over/underflow to bigfloat. so there is no
> > need for traps. they could be provided at the time of the
> > conversion to big*.
>
> OK. But will Perl support signaling and non-signaling NANs?
I don't think we should go for automatic overflow/underf
Uri Guttman
> we are planning automatic over/underflow to bigfloat. so there is no
> need for traps. they could be provided at the time of the
> conversion to big*.
OK. But will Perl support signaling and non-signaling NANs?
Dan Sugalski wrote:
>Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
>assembly language. I've got:
[...]
>
>Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since I've
>done numeric work.
I'm not a math weenie, but I would thing gamma(x) would be of use.
Also
At 10:58 AM 9/10/2001 -0700, David Whipp wrote:
>Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the
> > interpreter assembly language. I've got:
>[...]
> > Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while
> > since I've done numeric work.
>
>I'm not sur
> "DW" == David Whipp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DW> Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the
>> interpreter assembly language. I've got:
DW> [...]
>> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while
>> since I've done numer
Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the
> interpreter assembly language. I've got:
[...]
> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while
> since I've done numeric work.
I'm not sure where this belongs, but I'd really like to have
a usage
> "BL" == Bart Lateur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BL> On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 13:02:04 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>> Uri mentioned exp(x) = e^x, but I think if you are going to include
>>> log2, log10, log, etc, you should also include ln.
>>
>> Added.
BL> Er... aren't ln and log s
On Sat, 08 Sep 2001 13:02:04 -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>>Uri mentioned exp(x) = e^x, but I think if you are going to include
>>log2, log10, log, etc, you should also include ln.
>
>Added.
Er... aren't ln and log synonyms?
--
Bart.
Jeremy Howard:
# Uri Guttman wrote:
# > > "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
# >
# > >> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a
# while since
# > >> I've done numeric work.
# >
# > BS> ln, asinh, acosh, atanh2?
# >
# > dan mentioned log (base anything) but
On Sun, Sep 09, 2001 at 02:33:17PM +1000, Jeremy Howard wrote:
> Uri Guttman wrote:
> > > "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > >> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since
> > >> I've done numeric work.
> >
> > BS> ln, asinh, acosh, atanh2?
Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> >> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since
> >> I've done numeric work.
>
> BS> ln, asinh, acosh, atanh2?
>
> dan mentioned log (base anything) but i don't recall ln. and definitely
>
> "JH" == Jeremy Howard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
JH> Uri Guttman wrote:
>> > "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since
>> >> I've done numeric work.
>>
BS> ln, asinh, acosh, atanh2?
>
> "BS" == Benjamin Stuhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since
>> I've done numeric work.
BS> ln, asinh, acosh, atanh2?
dan mentioned log (base anything) but i don't recall ln. and definitely
the arc hyberbolics are in after
--- Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of
> the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
>
> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
> log2, log10, log
On Saturday 08 September 2001 04:14 pm, Brian Wheeler wrote:
> While not math, per se, there are bitops (and, or, not, xor, eqv) and
> shifts (though they can be simulated by "mul tx,ty,(2^bits)" and "div
> tx,ty,(2^bits)")
There will be bitops.
>
> I doubt rolls would be useful :)
Vuja de.
>
On Sat, 2001-09-08 at 11:00, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
>
> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
> log2, log10, l
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 02:55:36PM -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> zap is an ibm 360/370/390 assembler op code and i bet they
> trademarked/patented/whatevered its name. :)
>
> Zero and Add Packed.
>
> gawd, i can't believe i remembered that. i don't recall exactly what it
> does but i think it was
> "MGS" == Michael G Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MGS> On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 12:00:24PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
>> pow: Raise x to the y power
MGS> You forgot biff, zap and womp!
zap is an ibm 360/370/390 assembler op code and i bet they
trademarked
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 1/x is often handy, although maybe not enough to justify its own opcode.
>> (It is often used in other calculations, however, so perhaps one opcode
>> would be better than 3.)
>>
>> sqrt has traditionally been provided in langua
On Sat, Sep 08, 2001 at 12:00:24PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> pow : Raise x to the y power
You forgot biff, zap and womp!
--
Michael G. Schwern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>http://www.pobox.com/~schwern/
Perl6 Quality Assurance <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Kwalitee Is Job One
At 01:38 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Bryan C. Warnock wrote:
>On Saturday 08 September 2001 12:00 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> > Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> > assembly language. I've got:
> >
> > sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> > asin, acos, atan : arc-w
On Saturday 08 September 2001 12:00 pm, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
>
> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
> log2,
At 12:29 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Buddha Buck wrote:
>Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> > assembly language. I've got:
>
>
>
> > Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since I've
> > done numeric
At 12:12 PM 9/8/2001 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> > "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> DS> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since
> I've
> DS> done numeric work.
>
>i am not being picky, but there is secant, and arc hyperbolics too. you
>can deri
Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
> assembly language. I've got:
> Can anyone think of things I've forgotten? It's been a while since I've
> done numeric work.
Uri mentioned exp(x) = e^x, but I think if you are
> "DS" == Dan Sugalski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
DS> Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
DS> assembly language. I've got:
DS> sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
DS> asin, acos, atan : arc-whatevers
DS> shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whate
Okay, I'm whipping together the "fancy math" section of the interpreter
assembly language. I've got:
sin, cos, tan : Plain ones
asin, acos, atan: arc-whatevers
shinh, cosh, tanh : Hyperbolic whatevers
log2, log10, log: Base 2, base 10, and explicit base logarithms
29 matches
Mail list logo
