Re: Predicting Operators

2004-06-01 Thread Aaron Sherman
On Fri, 2004-05-28 at 02:26, Mark Lentczner wrote: It is clear that there is a missing list concatenate operator, and that its spelling should be ~~. Alas, that is already taken by smart match. On the other hand, perhaps comma fills this role - though I couldn't find my way through the

Predicting Operators

2004-05-28 Thread Mark Lentczner
Uri Guttman wrote: are you going to predict any new operators based on missing boxes as mendeleev did? :) Funny you should ask! It is clear that there is a missing list concatenate operator, and that its spelling should be ~~. Alas, that is already taken by smart match. On the other hand,