As a solution, a UNIVERSAL:::require() method can be added with the following
syntax:
$module = "Some::Module";
$module-require;
Seems to me that it would need to be written as
$module-UNIVERSAL::require;
How do you propose to avoid that?
What should happen if
John Porter wrote:
As a solution, a UNIVERSAL:::require() method can be added with the following
syntax:
$module = "Some::Module";
$module-require;
Seems to me that it would need to be written as
$module-UNIVERSAL::require;
How do you propose to avoid that?
Nathan Wiger wrote:
Huh? All classes inherit from UNIVERSAL implicitly.
Yes, but at that point in the execution, $module is not a class.
It's the same reason you can write:
$module-can('dance');
Once upon a time this was not possible. I guess it has changed.
--
John Porter
On Mon, Sep 18, 2000 at 11:20:15AM -0400, John Porter wrote:
Seems to me that it would need to be written as
$module-UNIVERSAL::require;
How do you propose to avoid that?
What is a class but a package? And what is the name of a class but a
package name? And since there's no
Michael G Schwern wrote:
It all works.
Mokay...
DTRT? Data Terminal Ready, Tim? Document Filing and Retrieval Tedium?
Do The Right Thing, of course.
--
John Porter
