Fwd: Re: Parallelism and Concurrency was Re: Ideas for aObject-Belongs-to-Thread (nntp: message 4 of 20) threading model (nntp: message 20 of 20 -lastone!-) (nntp: message 13 of 20)

2010-05-18 Thread nigelsandever
--- Forwarded message --- From: nigelsande...@btconnect.com To: Dave Whipp - d...@whipp.name +nntp+browseruk+e66dbbe0cf.dave#whipp.n...@spamgourmet.com Cc: Subject: Re: Parallelism and Concurrency was Re: Ideas for aObject-Belongs-to-Thread (nntp: message 4 of 20) threading model

Re: Re: Parallelism and Concurrency was Re: Ideas for aObject-Belongs-to-Thread (nntp: message 4 of 20) threading model (nntp: message 20 of 20 -lastone!-) (nntp: message 13 of 20)

2010-05-18 Thread Daniel Ruoso
Em Ter, 2010-05-18 às 12:58 -0700, Alex Elsayed escreveu: You are imposing a false dichotomy here. Neither 'green' threads nor kernel threads preclude each other. In fact, it can be convincingly argued that they work _best_ when combined. Please look at the GSoC proposal for hybrid threading