On Wed, 6 Sep 2000 22:58:05 -0400, John Porter wrote:
keys %hash = @things;
is defined as being equivalent to
@hash{ @things } = ();
Two more details to think about:
%hash = ( b = 'beta', d = 'delta' );
keys %hash = qw(a b c);
What happens to the values that
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Arrays: Builtins: merge() and demerge()
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Jeremy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 August 2000
Last Modified: 8 September 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 90
Matthew Wickline wrote:
(not on list, just tossing this in for discussion)
OK--we'll keep you cc'd in on this discussion.
RFC 90 (v3) wrote:
- Both Cmerge and demerge do not make
- a copy of the elements of their arguments;
- they simply create an alias to them:
-
1 @a = (1,3,5);
2
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Arrays: Overview of multidimensional array RFCs (RFC 203 through RFC 207)
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Jeremy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8 September 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number:
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Arrays: Notation for declaring and creating arrays
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Jeremy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8 September 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 204
Version: 1
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Arrays: New operator ';' for creating array slices
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Jeremy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 8 September 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 205
Version: 1
Due to a processing hiccup, a some of the last few RFCs were announced
twice, with different numbering.
For the record, this is the correct numbering of RFC 202 through 207:
202 Arrays: Overview of multidimensional array RFCs
203 Arrays: Notation for declaring and
Nathan Wiger wrote:
This RFC proposes that operators in a list context should be applied
element-wise to the elements of their arguments:
@d = @b * @c; # Returns (2,8,18)
If the lists are not of equal length, an error is raised.
I've been watching this RFC for a while. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nathan Wiger wrote:
This RFC proposes that operators in a list context should be applied
element-wise to the elements of their arguments:
@d = @b * @c; # Returns (2,8,18)
If the lists are not of equal length, an error is raised.
I've been watching
