Christian Soeller wrote:
> Karl Glazebrook wrote:
> > Buddha Buck wrote:
> > > >
> > > > @x = 3 * $y[|i];
> > > >
> > > >It's not as clean as @x = 3 * @y, but it is cleaner context-wise.
> > >
> > > And one could argue that:
> > >
> > > @x = map 3*^_, @y;
> > >
> > > is cleaner yet...
> >
>
Karl Glazebrook wrote:
>
> Buddha Buck wrote:
> > >
> > > @x = 3 * $y[|i];
> > >
> > >It's not as clean as @x = 3 * @y, but it is cleaner context-wise.
> >
> > And one could argue that:
> >
> > @x = map 3*^_, @y;
> >
> > is cleaner yet...
>
> PDL already allows $x = 3*$y
>
> why step back
Buddha Buck wrote:
> >
> > @x = 3 * $y[|i];
> >
> >It's not as clean as @x = 3 * @y, but it is cleaner context-wise.
>
> And one could argue that:
>
> @x = map 3*^_, @y;
>
> is cleaner yet...
PDL already allows $x = 3*$y
why step backwards?
KArl
