Jeremy Howard wrote:
> To be honest, I don't really get the point of stuff like NumPy's "NewAxis",
> so I might be misunderstanding your proposal. But at least for your
It's just another way to specify how implicit loops of a scalar
operation are iterated over array elements (TIMTWTDI). Very mu
Christian Soeller wrote:
> Maybe that's already implicit in the broadcasting proposal but it
> wouldn't hurt to spell it out:
>
> A dimension size of 1 should be broadcasted to match that of the
> other operand. So, for example, the following shapes (returned by
> @#array) are compatible:
>
