Christian Soeller wrote:
Jeremy Howard wrote:
However I like the Numeric Python reshape() semantics better:
http://starship.python.net/~da/numtut/array.html
Is that in any significant way different from PDL's reshape?
http://pdl.sourceforge.net/PDLdocs/Core.html#reshape
The
I *still* think it should be "unmerge"! ;-)
Damian
"DC" == Damian Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DC I *still* think it should be "unmerge"! ;-)
Hrmpf. It should be reshape.
(Which would be its own inverse and saves a keyword.)
chaim
--
Chaim FrenkelNonlinear Knowledge, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Removed perl6-announce x-post
Chaim Frenkel wrote:
"DC" == Damian Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DC I *still* think it should be "unmerge"! ;-)
Hrmpf. It should be reshape.
(Which would be its own inverse and saves a keyword.)
reshape() has already been proposed (RFC 148):
Jeremy Howard wrote:
However I like the Numeric Python reshape() semantics better:
http://starship.python.net/~da/numtut/array.html
Is that in any significant way different from PDL's reshape?
http://pdl.sourceforge.net/PDLdocs/Core.html#reshape
PS: How does one pronounce 'hrmpf'?
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Arrays: Builtins: merge() and demerge()
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Jeremy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 10 August 2000
Last Modified: 8 September 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Number: 90
Matthew Wickline wrote:
(not on list, just tossing this in for discussion)
OK--we'll keep you cc'd in on this discussion.
RFC 90 (v3) wrote:
- Both Cmerge and demerge do not make
- a copy of the elements of their arguments;
- they simply create an alias to them:
-
1 @a = (1,3,5);
2
