Michael G Schwern wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:21:25PM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> (3)
> > obtain one or more data handles for test input data and validation data, (4)
> > compile 1&2 as perl source code, and (5) launch the tests, which can then
> > used the appropriate data handles.
>
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 11:21:25PM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> This RFC also seems to be related to RFC 183... using POD for testing. Now
> the model of use apparently envisioned for RFC 183 is to have the tests
> inside the POD, and then use a preprocessor to hack them out and put them in
>
RFC 186 is another interesting -io RFC, even though I'm not on the -io
list. I couldn't find any discussion in the mail archive, so here's
some to
start it. Please copy me on the discussion. Sorry for cross posting,
but
this is attempting to unify RFCs from different lists; I've bcc'd two of
th
RFC 186 is another interesting -io RFC, even though I'm not on the -io
list. I couldn't find any discussion in the mail archive, so here's some to
start it. Please copy me on the discussion. Sorry for cross posting, but
this is attempting to unify RFCs from different lists; I've bcc'd two of th
I'm not on -io, so copy me on discussion. But this RFC was intriguing, so I
read the discussion on the archive for it, and have the following comments.
Perl6 RFC Librarian wrote:
>format FILE =
> @<: @
> $name, $ssn
> .
> =head2 New Syntax
>
> Under the new syntax, a f
This and other RFCs are available on the web at
http://dev.perl.org/rfc/
=head1 TITLE
Replace default filehandle/select with $DEFOUT, $DEFERR, $DEFIN
=head1 VERSION
Maintainer: Nathan Wiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 17 Aug 2000
Last-Modified: 13 Sep 2000
Mailing List: [EMAIL PROT
[added -io cross-post]
John Porter wrote:
>
> Just MHO, but I don't think this is the kind of thing that should
> go in the core. Just MHO.
I think I agree. Just to clarify, the only reason it's an RFC and not
just a Perl 5 module is because RFC 14 (the one on a new open()) relies
on a handler
